It's Westerwelle and company, of course, for something completely different. By now many are leaving cries, the welfare state ruining the republic, only to be concealed that the Yellow-Schwerz this promotion overwhelmingly for a very narrow Section of the population betrieiben, namely those that are either not to rely on to generate their own income or whose employment income is so high that any fundamental reform of the existing base tables approximate legislative them - financially - in fact some would "patch on the coat. By Hr. Westerwelle ultimately the job seekers not only for their own fate held responsible, but also noted the widespread use of this group do not want to work, he stirs up just as old as it is false, mainly from conservatives, fueled anti-social agitation, but also would-be -alls like the gentlemen Clement and Schroeder have joined with joy (and the Greens, the Hartz legislation with "done wrong", they purportedly relies on a civil rights oriented party is not really credible).
proves Any serious sociological study on the subject, that the up job of the person concerned but the lack of adequate jobs is the problem. Simple: There is due to the stabilization process automation in the production of neat little paid employment. And until Germany is - then with decent salaries aufwartendes - Service land is, it will take probably several more generations.
I can from this drivel as Fri der Leyen, assuming we only had enough full-day nursery places would do to the problem of single parents in the labor market largely, no longer listening. There are too few part-time jobs. By also for the end credits seemingly absurd practice of various social benefits (family allowance, child allowance, housing allowance) how lucrative a job at all for just such persons.
over me with the most interest to clients, the disabled, will - in relation to the labor market - for years not even seriously discussed. The only properly working graduates job placement for this Persons was some time ago - for cost reasons - set, although the results were excellent. Even if you - like me - will make as a lawyer even independently, are placed insurmountable obstacles in such a way that even someone with a very good nerves at some point of desperation is at hand. I'm ggw. "Only" in the EU pension, nevertheless, I shall take the chatter of Westerwelle, White (who says yes, one could rule set that was equal to cheating in many ways together to make it 30% below even the earned income of the least-earning fifth of the population, now cut quite, lastly, basic security recipients so again now entitled to one-off benefits, where everybody knows that one of those ridiculous 40, - €, which can cover all the unique requirements that can make almost anything) and friends directly.
If even highly qualified, despite handicaps, mobile and downright workaholic people like myself are sabotaging the system largely as it has to go so those who may not have such verbal or intellectual skills. is
The fact that the entire welfare state approach to black and yellow deeply dishonest the whole show now, in the opinion occurred discussion with the government.
Here is the link to the presentation by Guido Westerwelle world online:
http://bit.ly/9REBRT.
If one looks now that the municipal associations ggw. fight for a constitutional amendment so that the Argen should remain (the Federal Employment Agency has no real interest in it), then but not because it is the service providers to the supposed power from a single source is that in all the above groups of people just _not_ work. No, by all whining how much Hartz IV would cost but especially municipalities: Through the merging of social and unemployment assistance especially the local authorities discovered a massive savings that they have in recent years partly expanded sent in that they they even have a flat rate of accommodation costs relating to a large extent, especially with similar computational tricks which is already the rule unconstitutional sentence was justified.
us not fool ourselves: It was last of all and zuallerwenigst about people actually get back to work (seven million recipients of basic security and the welfare money that would be a rather lofty claim). It was - on the claim that the alleged effects of globalization - one and only aim to reveal, at the bottom of the population a savings potential, enabling businesses made possible by a substantial reduction of the remuneration levels on the low-wage sector until the sharholder value really prmonient in to make the foreground. Therefore one must not even be a leftist that sees itself in the final analysis, a Professor in the sense result is not significantly different. And that's what was politically but also deliberate. What is unique to the SPD as a party and the alleged civil rights Greens can not blame-oriented, is that they are the Basta-Chancellor in his miserable Muskelspielchen in Parliament and is still followed by his confidence in the case have "lie down on the cross" can be.
If I already read today, however, in part, the current government coalition could "wash their hands of it" pilates, and finally it was not created in the Hartz legislation involved, showing once again the consummate political hypocrisy argument. First, the black and yellow all Hartz package of course supported, so it has always corresponded to their political convictions. To another, Who could the current government coalition at the federal level than prevent them to adopt an actual growth acceleration law by the rule sets on the existence of minimum necessary ggw. to the 480, - € would have been increased? As I read again today in SPIEGEL online - and one might almost think it would go directly to the money of the writing editor: What the government is going to cost everything again?
So what! As the speculators have driven the economy almost in the ditch "has no longer a man asked how expensive the whole thing could well be. Since it was at one time only on a "bird's do or die." an economy is in danger, every possible means is right, it is contrary to even the very any market model. Is it "only" seven millions of basic security and social welfare concerned, may be saved funny straight on, the clientele may be yes, on the one hardly defend, on the other it has not the money, the ruling parties for their own purpose tracking smear, as the hotel industry too obvious on a large scale may appear to be in the situation.
Here is the link to the opinion which I will discuss in the next few days, probably even more: http://