In Rhineland-Palatinate few days ago, a plan of action (the first at the level of provinces) to implement the UN Convention on disability rights published (the link to the Action Plan ... : http://bit.ly/ aKwjEM ). Besides a lot of praise, there was also criticism of the Rhineland-Palatinate CDU parliamentary group. Since I the resulting request to the Rhineland-Palatinate state parliament was extremely brilliant, I could not help me to write to comment:
has
The Rhineland-Palatinate CDU parliamentary group, of course - right in their concern. And in Baden-Wuerttemberg and North Rhine-Westphalia also all much, much better resolved than in a state that can boast of is to have the country's most agile Disabilities Officer in Germany. Hr. Miles-Paul is - of course - just hot air, the action plan is a disaster, to be ashamed of straightforwardly to read the paper also
only, so insubstantial it reads.
But seriously: How pathetic and come down like a fraction must be really to have their social and educational spokespersons have launched such a nonsense?
While in Rhineland-Palatinate ascertaining numerical least possible that inclusion here, perhaps in part badly small steps, but still!, Lived, propagated and is also initialized (the effort level are very long and we were all clear that not everything at once would be available) Baden-Württemberg has for years considered the disability policy backward state in Germany (with a narrow margin well to the Free State of Saxony ). In North Rhine-Westphalia has to Fri summer (the Minister of Culture there is really so), even in spring, autumn and winter and summer not only "contribute to the hunt." If there's anything in education policy, then only because of initiatives that do not come from the coalition of CDU and FDP (the parent associations in NRW are very active, for example).
The demands of the CDU in Rhineland-Palatinate state parliament read thus well as a revival of disability policy in the 1970s: full receipt of the special schools and perpetuating this "offer" by going beyond the creation of so-called centers of excellence is correct (, competence would be there you urgently needed), school inclusion only avails when the segregated special education, one impudence is not writing now at a time of quality criteria, this topos
in special education in recent decades has now played really a completely subordinate role ( and the topic of the creation of measurable quality standards become the first place with the discussion on school inclusion is an issue, now it would in fact at one time are actually necessary for the special education centers to participate in a quality standard that they have to date not even met in batches), the creation of a professional qualification funding university degree (the then
conclusion not only second, but fourth or fifth class would be, not a single student would support such a conclusion can compete with an adequate professional training). The only point of reading at least half-way reasonable concerns, which is strictly necessary training for Teachers on conveyor (perhaps it helps so what).
In short: The application of the worst education policy roll-back is in the school's policy for disabled people, which I have read in recent years. The request is an unprecedented scandal.
If that seriously the educational policy of the Union should be, I think the Christian Democrats from a policy perspective for not selected.
How pathetic criticism of the union on in Rhineland-Palatinate action plan is demonstrated by the impressive fact that the request of the Union (and the reason for their criticism, substantial I could not otherwise read from it) _ausschließlich_
education policy is based. Support of the motion is evidently not the group, I assume that the funding agencies have made massive lobbying influence. Otherwise such a request of stupid really is hardly justifiable.
Ah yes, here is the link to the request of the CDU parliamentary group: http://bit.ly/aKwjEM .
